Is clobbering a thing to take passively?
I only ask because it seems (by my corpus searches) that the most common use of the verb clobber is in the phrase get clobbered by. Which may be passive voice, if you don’t insist strictly on forms of be as the auxiliary required for the passive voice. Anyway, it’s at least notionally passive.
That’s not to say that it’s the only way clobbering occurs. Often enough the clobberer is named. But who is clobbering whom, and how? Well, phrases that turn up in the Corpus of Contemporary American English include “Clinton clobbered” and “got clobbered by Clinton” along with “the market has clobbered” and “getting clobbered by the market” and “the Cardinals clobbered” and “clobbered the Cardinals”…
In other words, politics, finance, sports, that sort of thing. Literal physical clobbering? Not so much. It may sound like clubbing a robber who’s jobbing the cupboards in a clapboard house, but it’s more like giving a legal drubbing to a lobbyist or jubilantly grabbing a fumbled football and doubling your point lead. Or, more to the point, “getting clobbered” is the experience of being the butt of such problems. If you get clobbered, you may blubber, but your body will probably rest intact.
Just as well, I suppose. Not just because physical violence is bad, but because… well, tell me what is and isn’t literal clobbering. To me, the sound of “clobber” is the sound of being punched on my head, especially on my ear (ow). But I don’t think anyone really uses it that specifically. If a parent says to a child “I’ll clobber you” (do they still say that?), it probably means whack or spank – though preferably the threat suffices and the exact act does not need to be determined. But, though personal physical assault shows up early in the use of the word, that doesn’t seem to be its origin.
By the way, before we get to that, how old would you guess this word is? When do you think it was first used?
The 1850s? Sure… if you mean the sense of ‘patch’ or ‘cobbler’s paste’. Which is not related to the verb in question; it may come from an older word for clay.
The 1870s? Yeah… if you mean the sense of ‘clothing’ (e.g., “a new suit of clobber”). Which is also not related to the verb in question; it is speculated that it may be related to German Kleider, but I don’t know if there’s any actual support for that.
The 1890s? Well, hmmm…
The thing is, the Oxford English Dictionary’s earliest hit, from 1944, has to do with aerial bombardment in World War II. Shortly after that, they refer to sports, personal assault, and more war, followed by more figurative senses. Wiktionary says it showed up around 1941, possibly imitative of the sound of bombs. Merriam-Webster says circa 1942, no comment on origins. But Green’s Dictionary of Slang has an 1894 citation from Australia, “The larrikin / So full of sin, / has now no fear of getting clobbert,” plus an 1892 quote from a barrack-room ballad by Kipling, “An a’ woman comes and clobs ’im from be’ind.”
So that’s the trouble: we don’t really know for sure. Our research efforts have bombed, or at least they have bombs. But, really, no one is clamouring to discover the origin. When one gets mobbed by bumptious problems, etymology is not job one.





