Daily Archives: October 22, 2012

bayonet

I guess soldiers are using bayonets less and less these days. (Horses too.) Actually, even a century ago they were responsible for less than one percent of battlefield casualties. But they do have their uses.

Heck, I use a bayonet pretty much every day.

OK, no, I use a bayonet mount.

Let me back up a bit first. A bayonet is a blade that can be affixed to the front end of a rifle, allowing the soldier to use the rifle as a stabbing or cutting weapon. I’m put in mind of a cartoon – I wish I could remember where I saw it; MAD Magazine perhaps – where a man who’s about to be executed by a firing squad is asked if he has a last wish. “Yes,” says the man, “I wish not to be shot.” The colonel tells him his wish is granted. Ah, the condemned man smiles! Then the colonel turns and shouts to the squad, “Fix bayonets!”

Bayonet is a reasonably straightforward word. It’s pronounced like three English words, “bay o net”… seems almost too easy, doesn’t it? (It also has the ring of “ban it” in a strong Southern US accent. But bayonets have not been banned. They’re safer than most weapons – for the victim. Much more dangerous for the attacker than the means of killing preferred today.) I suppose if you buy one in an online auction, you could call it an ebayonet. After all, it looks like a San Francisco (or Boston) network: bay-o-net. But no, it’s a now well established symbol of military aggression and even valour. It may not be needed that much in battle, but the image of a knife plus a gun has such epic appeal – it’s two, two, two deaths in one!

It is thought that bayonet comes from French Bayonnette, referring to an origin in the city of Bayonne. What the French were doing in New Jersey I don’t know. Oh, wait – the other Bayonne, the one with the really good ham (a French equivalent to prosciutto – slice it thin!).

Anyway, when the bayonet was first attached to guns, the gun in use was the musket, and they took some time to reload – time during which a wounded enemy or animal (they were also used for hunting) could escape or attack, endangering the sporting baronet or his huntsman – or the soldier, of course. So the idea came along of fixing this flat dagger, called a Bayonnette or bayonet, to the front of the gun quickly so you had a nice long stabbing thing. (Yes, yes, you could just stab the beast or man with a blade in your hand, but that would mean getting very close. Better to have an extra several feet of reach. Even at that it’s awfully close.) Ere long bayonets were permanently associated with long guns.

But at first they fixed it on by sticking it into the muzzle of the gun. Well, that had its hazards, which I think are probably fairly guessable. When you had fixed bayonet, you could not shoot! So they quickly came up with the idea of attaching it to the side of the barrel at the front, so you could fire with the bayonet in place. Various styles and mounts were developed. You wanted something that was easy to use but would hold the bayonet in place no matter how much stabbing and pulling you did. Or digging and cutting – many bayonets were designed to be usable also for cutting wires (using serrated edges), digging in the ground (with a more spade-like shape), and other similarly utile applications for a sharp and pointy tool. (They’re useful detached, too; I’m sure many a bagel or beignet or even Bayonne ham has been sliced with one in a pinch.)

One kind of mount developed for bayonets involved rings with flanges – or pins and grooves – that would be matched and then twisted into place to overlap and hold the bayonet in place. As with many things developed for military purposes, it came to have civilian applications too. Some kinds of light bulbs, for instance.

Photographers who use cameras with interchangeable lenses are generally familiar with a bayonet mount: put lens against body, ring to ring, matching the dots, then twist a fraction of a turn until you get a satisfying click. And then – ironically – with bayonet fixed, you are ready to shoot. You may not be mounted (on a horse or otherwise), but your lens is, and we hope it’s nice and sharp. And you’ll be taking pictures, not lives.

forty-five

I have a collection of more than forty-five forty-fives, accumulated by when I was fifteen, a third of my current age.

My life has always revolved with music – not around it, and not it around my life, but spinning together. I have several dozen (perhaps a hundred?) vinyl LPs, each one made to revolve one hundred times every three minutes as it plays from outside in, each one twelve inches in diameter. And I have more like a thousand CDs, each one 4.75 inches in diameter and playing at a constant linear speed about 1.3 metres per second, making about 500 rotations per minute when it starts at the inside and slowing to about 200 RPM by the time it reaches the outside edge – if it does. Each of these is a collection of songs made to be played in sequence.

But a forty-five – originally made as competition for the 33 1/3 to replace the 78 – has one song per side. It has a large hole in the middle, made so that it would be easier to play them in quick sequence – a large spindle, easier to slide onto a tapered top, so a changer could play through a symphony on several discs with minimal interruption. It plays from the outside in, and it’s a one-shot deal; before you get to the large hole, the song is over.

There’s another song on the other side; it’s not expected to be as good. On the backside of “Rasputin” (which we played many times) is “Don’t Change Lovers in the Middle of the Night” (which I could not possibly say anything more about). On the backside for “Bette Davis Eyes” is “Miss You Tonight.” Backing “Industrial Disease,” it’s “Solid Rock”; the B-side of “Urgent” is “Girl on the Moon”; Joan Jett’s “I Love Rock ‘n’ Roll” is backed with “You Don’t Know What You’ve Got”; “Turn Me Loose” is backed by “Prissy Prissy”; “Echo Beach” has “Teddy the Dink”; for “Harden My Heart,” it’s “Don’t Be Lonely”; with “Start Me Up” you get “No Use in Crying”; for “Da Da Da” it’s “Sabine Sabine Sabine.” You may conclude that they didn’t want to have two hits on the same single – they could sell more records if they had one hit each. So you get the two sides of the record: one made to be number one with a bullet, the other to take the bullet.

There are exceptions. The back of “Seven Bridges Road” by The Eagles is “The Long Run”; on “Another One Bites the Dust” it’s “Don’t Try Suicide.” Both of those B-sides were also popular. And some of the forty-fives just have two versions of the same song – such as “How Long” by Rod Stewart and “Heat of the Moment” by Asia.

And there are hidden treasures, too. Listen to this: “Urgent” by Foreigner, as sung by the Doobie Brothers. Where did I get that? It’s just the 45 of the song by Foreigner, played at 33 1/3. Slightly less urgent, much more doobie flavour.

Forty-five thus has a taste of revolution (forty-five per minute), of double-sidedness, of one shot (and then a flip and one more shot). It also has a taste of a revolver. Something over a century ago now, when the bullets of the day seemed not to have enough stopping power for colonial invaders who wanted to quell the natives quickly, bigger bullets were specified. A few manufacturers stepped up to the plate, and the winner was Colt. We are familiar with the Colt .45, yes? It’s a revolver. Six shots. Big bullets, much more forceful than the .38s they had been using: these ones were almost half an inch wide (.45 means it’s .45 inches in diameter). You get not just one shot, not just two, but six, if you can. And it makes a big hole, fairly well guaranteed to cap the number of its target’s days.

Six shots with a forty-five. Six-forty-five: another term that relates to shooting – the nominal 6 cm by 4.5 cm negative format for medium-format cameras (actually 5.6 by 4.2). They fit 16 rather than 12 photos on a roll of 120 film. A 4:3 aspect ratio and a 4:3 ratio of number of photos. Just as you have 60 seconds in a minute and 45 revolutions in a minute – also 4:3. And then there’s 33: 3+3=6, yes, but consider this: the factors of 45 are 1, 3, 5, 9, and 15. They add up to 33. But there is no third. Oh, but 45 is still prettier. You have 3×3=9, and 9×5=45, and 4+5=9.

But what you really want to know is that it all comes around to 45, it all adds up to it: all the single digits. 0+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9=45. Once around, and there you are, and then you’re back to 0 – the big hole in the middle. The needle is clicking against the inside track as it rotates over and over again, making its little “forty-five, forty-five, forty-five” sound. Time for the next song. Would that be the B side? Or did you save the A for the second spin?