My latest article for The Week is on a word that many of you will not recognize as legitimate. And yet I predict that it will ultimately be standard English. I am talking about thats as a relative possessive, as in the title above. (Do not be misled by the ambiguous title of the article on theweek.com, which I did not write, or the theme image, which I did not see in advance of publication. This article has nothing to do with the contraction that’s for that is or that has.)
Search Sesquiotica
Be a patron!
Support Sesquiotica and get extra premium content and goodies. Starts as low as $1 a month! Find out more and subscribe on Patreon.comI am for hire
I earn my living as an independent editor, writer, and educator. Find out more and contact me at jamesharbeck.com.Buy the T-shirt (or coffee mug or hip flask)
Wear it proudly:
I operate on a NEED-TO-KNOW basis. I need to know EVERYTHING.
Buy it at cafepress.ca/sesquiphernalia12 Gifts for Writers ebook – free download
Buy my books
Buy my books on Lulu.com:
- Confessions of a Word Lush (paperback)
- Confessions of a Word Lush (ebook)
- Songs of Love and Grammar (paperback)
- Songs of Love and Grammar (ebook)
- 12 Gifts for Writers (print edition)
You can also get them on Amazon.com. Please note that I make less than half as much per book if you buy them there, however.
Word Tasting Notes Google group
Get just the word tasting notes daily by email – join the Google Word Tasting Notes group.-
Recent Posts
Top Posts
Categories
- album
- arts
- BBC
- biography
- Coffice Space
- Definition
- editing
- from the bookshelf
- fun
- language and linguistics
- new old words
- NOV
- photography
- poems
- Poetry Minute and a Half
- Povember
- pronunciation tips
- sentence tastings
- The Week
- Uncategorized
- Word Country
- word pictures
- word portraits
- word reviews
- word sommelier
- word tasting notes
- writing
Past posts
Blogroll
- 366 Days of Words in Science What this is: 1 photo + 1 word x 366 days. 0 rules.
- Affixes: the building blocks of English Michael Quinion’s site based on his book Ologies and Isms.
- Angry Sub-Editor Patrick Neylan, Eeditor of business reports. Permanently angry about the abuse of English, maths and logic. Terms and conditions: by reading this blog you accept that all opinions expressed herein will henceforth be your opinions.
- Arnold Zwicky’s Blog One of the best lingustic minds out there blogging.
- Bag of Anything lies, propaganda, doggerel
- bradshaw of the future Etymological delectations and more
- Cerebral Boinkfest A blog about the arts, books, flora and fauna, vittles, and whatever comes to mind.
- Coffee with Warren My dad’s newspaper column, about wonderful people and things
- Constellations of Words Explore the etymology and symbolism of the constellations
- Corpus of Contemporary American English 385 million words of contemporary American English texts, searchable for finding frequency, collocations, syntactic roles, etc.
- Dialect Blog The accents of English
- Double-Tongued Dictionary A lexicon of fringe English, focusing on slang, jargon, and new words.
- Evopropinquitous A compendium of knowledge gleaned from seemingly endless scholarly pursuits in the wild. (Or: Things I learned as a field biologist.)
- Google Ngram Viewer Graph relative frequency of words over time in Google’s digitized books.
- Ideas Illustrated Survival Skills for the Information Age
- Iva Cheung Editor, indexer, designer, publishing consultant; Tom Fairley Award winner
- James Harbeck My personal site
- Kate Britt Kate Britt, a professional editor
- Language Log Language as it happens – looked at by linguists who know what’s really going on
- lewd_tongue The twitter feed of Ross Ewage, noted vulgarian. A dirty mind is a terrible thing to waste.
- Logophilius This blog is for anyone who commonly finds beauty, uniqueness, and joy in printed material of every stripe.
- Magical Letter Page A variety of information and views on phonaesthetics, sound symbolism, and similar things
- Motivated Grammar Prescriptivism Must Die!
- Ondionline An alternative to the faded Fabers and burnt Nortons.
- OUPBlog The blog of Oxford University Press USA, including lots on words.
- Popular Linguistics Magazine The monthly online magazine that brings language- and linguistics-focused stories and research to the masses.
- Quote Investigator Exploring the origins of quotations
- Sentence first An Irishman’s blog about the English language
- Sesquiotic on flickr My flickr site for my photos
- Speech Accent Archive The speech accent archive uniformly presents a large set of speech samples from a variety of language backgrounds.
- Strong Language A sweary blog about swearing, by me, Stan Carey, and a number of noteworthy others
- Ten minutes past deadline Sub-editing when the clock’s run out but the copy hasn’t. By Ed Latham.
- The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows A wistful, mournful, fanciful lexicon.
- The Economist "Johnson" language blog In this blog, named for the dictionary-maker Samuel Johnson, correspondents write about the effects that the use (and sometimes abuse) of language have on politics, society and culture around the world
- The Etyman™ Language Blog Adventures in Etymology and Language
- The Ideophone Sounding out ideas on African languages, sound symbolism, and expressivity
- The Language of Food Essays on the language of food by Dan Jurafsky.
- The Lexicographer's Rules The personal weblog of Grant Barrett, editor of the Double-Tongued Dictionary, a collection of words from the fringes of English.
- The Nasty Guide to Nice Writing A pervert and an uptight food freak, still stuck on their nasty divorce, give fresh and clear insight on grammar and writing.
- The Phrase Finder Origins of phrases, sayings, idioms and expressions.
- The Stroppy Editor Minding other people’s language. A lot.
- The Word Blog A blog about words in their natural habitat.
- TV Tropes The place to look for current pop culture references.
- word nerd The blog of language columnist Howard Richler.
- Word Spy The word lover’s guide to new words.
- wordcount.org A ranking by frequency of 86,800 words of British English.
- Wordorigins.org A good site about the origins of words and phrases
- WordPress.com
- WordPress.org
- wordsmith.org Home of A.Word.A.Day and more.
- Wordsmoker because words are highly addictive too
- World Wide Words An excellent place to look for reliable information on the origins and uses of words and phrases.
- You Don't Say Veteran drudge John E. McIntyre writes about language, usage, journalism & arbitrarily chosen subjects.
- You Don't Say John McIntyre, whom James Wolcott calls “the Dave Brubeck of the art and craft of copy editing,” writes on language, editing, journalism, and other manifestations of human frailty.
Meta
I actually feel panicked just looking at an apostrophe-less ‘thats’ now that you have pointed out that the title contains it. Before reading, I didn’t even notice that it was apostrophe-less. Seriously. Someone put clothes on the naked ‘thats’ please! LOL!!
Sorry, but no. Nuh-uh. Not going to let this happen. Especially when they adjusted the definition for “literally” to reflect the many years that word was misused. Nope. That’s is That’s and That’s THAT!
I’m not sure how to take your response. The article has nothing to do with the contraction that’s for that is and that has. It is addressing a usage of that’s that is currently considered unacceptable in standard English: as a relative possessive, e.g., in “A word that’s time has come” rather than “A word whose time has come” or “A word for which the time has come.” Are you saying that you find “A word that’s time has come” acceptable and not even remarkable, and object only to “A word thats time has come,” or are you saying you are responding only to your reading of the article title without having read the article – or, for that matter, the paragraph above the article title here on the page?
You make a good case, but after years of reading, writing, and editing seeing “thats” makes something in my gut twist uncomfortable.
Your argument for “thats” seems logical, but that might not help matters. The English language makes a habit of thumbing its nose at logic.
Still, you may be right, but I don’t think we’ll see acceptance in our lifetimes. I certainly won’t be using it. Like “alright” and “utilize,” it just doesn’t come naturally to me.
Can’t say I’ll be first in the queue to start using it – even though you put up some good arguments – but I will be watching for any erroneous use of the apostrophe if others do!
You may have a point, James. My three-year-old just corrected his older brothers: “Thats butt is sticking out, not whose.” I only caught that bit, so I don’t know what the context is, but it obviously seemed pretty natural and correct to him. (Granted, he’s three and still says “goed”, so maybe that’s not evidence in its favor.)
What about whats instead? I may have used it or dreamed that I did.
That’s used in the same versions of English that use “what” for that: “This bloke what I saw”; “This bloke whats dog bit me.” Not a contender for standard English, I don’t think, but certainly available dialectally.