Proof that English spelling is an evil trap
My latest article for The Week looks at 10 words that are further evidence of the malicious character of English spelling. They look like they should be easy to pronounce, and many of us pronounce them as they look… but they’re really supposed to be pronounced quite differently:
10 words we’ve forgotten how to pronounce
This entry was posted in The Week
and tagged blackguard
, English spelling
, spelling pronunciations
, The Week
. Bookmark the permalink
“Worcester” may be “Wister” in MASS., but in England it is “Woosta” with a first syllable that rhymes with “puss” (and Bertie Wooster’s surname was, apparently, meant to be a homonym). Otherwise — a great article!
totally learned something new 🙂
Reblogged this on machwani and commented:
english is really a tough language for the natives of tanzania
Reblogged this on Smriti "Simmi" D. Isaac and commented:
An evil trap, indeed!
I believe that’s the beauty of the language though. It definitely shows us how the world now operates post structuralism
You wrote: The “forrid” version is in fact still the first pronunciation given in the Oxford English Dictionary, and in Merriam-Webster and Collins too.
In the Merriam-Webster dictionary, at least, position has no relevance. From the Explanatory Notes in my 50-year-old edition: A second-place variant is not to be regarded as per se a less desirable variant than the one given first.
True… I think they go by historical precedence there. I should have said so; you’re right.