Somerset

OK, picture this dream: Alanis Morissette is in the bath, taunting you by singing “Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite!” (from Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, by the Beatles). And then she does a backflip from standing! What could it mean?

Well, perhaps it means you have your summer set out for you. One way or another, though, you’re dreaming of Somerset. (Or, as denizens of that county are famous for saying it, “Zomerzet.”)

Somerset is historically a county of England, over on the west side, across the mouth of the Severn from the south side of Wales. Significant cities in it include Bath and Taunton. Bath, ah, that famed spa, popular with the summer set coming from London in times past. Well, why not summer? Somerset comes from Sumortunsæte, meaning “Sumortun’s people,” and Sumortun for its part is now Somerton (not as important a place in itself as it once was) and is thought to get its name from being, originally, a summer settlement – a farmstead abandoned in the winter.

OK, but the song? In “Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite!” – which is modeled on nineteenth-century advertisements for popular entertainments – you will hear this: “And Mr. H. will demonstrate Ten summersets he’ll undertake on solid ground.” Now, summersets is an uncommon spelling. You’re more likely to see somersets.

But that’s misleading, because somersets is itself altered from somersaults. Oh, well, now, that’s helpful, isn’t it? I’m not saying the county is named after a flip; that would be rather flip of me. No, it was just a word confusion, a bit of folk-etymology reanalysis. And in fact somersaults is in its turn a mutation of sobersaults. Which are not so called because you can’t do them when drunk (perhaps on some Meursault); rather, it’s by way of French from Latin suprasaltus, from supra “over” and saltus “leap”.

It’s not that the articulatory gesture of saying somerset or somersault is highly reminiscent of a flip; there’s no flap of the tongue – the tip touches for a hiss, the lips meet, the tongue passes through the liquid /r/ and the tip touches again, and it ends in a stop, again at the tip. At most there’s that little back-and-forth, which is repeatable indefinitely, as we see in singing “Summertime, summertime, sum-sum-summertime.”

But, now, put that into French phonotactics and you get a bit of a turnover. Some places in Quebec had been given English names, and one of them was Somerset. Well, the English aren’t the only ones who can do folk-etymology reanalysis. Say Somerset with a French accent and what do you get? Something that easily enough slips towards a more recognizable French form. Morissette is one of the grand old pure laine Quebec family names (along with Tremblay, Paquette, Bouchard, Duceppe, Dion…), and the merset sounds rather like it when you put it into French phonemics. And the first syllable? Well, must be saint, reduced as it tends to be. And so was invented a saint who never existed: Saint-Morissette, a place in Québec. (But, hey, Stanfold became Saint-Folle!) But, given that Alanis Morissette has played God (in the movie Dogma), that’s close enough to a saint, no?

So! How do you like them apples? If you like ’em well enough, make cider with them – it’s popular in Somerset.

Thanks to Roberto De Vido for suggesting somersault.

prorogue

This word is all the rage in Canada lately. Until late 2008, it was something that happened without anyone outside of Parliament really noticing: when a legislative session was done, or when it was anyway a good time to wrap up business for it and start afresh, the queen (or king) would – or rather the governor general, the queen’s (or king’s) proxy in Canada, would – on the advice of the prime minister prorogue parliament. There would perhaps be a little wrap-up speech, and any bills not yet voted on would die and would have to be reintroduced the next session if they were to see the books.

And then Stephen Harper did it in an unexpected situation, to end a session when it had barely begun, just to avoid a vote of no confidence. Everyone suddenly had heard this word prorogue. And now, a year later, prorogation is being used not in such a dire situation but nonetheless in what had appeared to be the middle, not the end, of a legislative session. Although technically the governor general is not obliged to assent to the prime minister’s request to prorogue, it would appear that the current governor general views the decision as the prime minister’s proroguative.

This is leading some people to say Stephen Harper is a pro rogue. Not just any amateur rogue – he’s making a career of it! But prorogue is not actually related to rogue (nor to that Irish – and subsequently military – term of abuse, pogue, which, like rogue, has a French-style spelling but does not actually come by way of French). No, it comes from Latin pro, “for”, and rogare, “ask”. (You’ll see the latter root in interrogate and abrogate, for instance.)

It’s a funny word, prorogue. Certainly it sounds kind of funny; the two /r/s give it a Scooby-Doo sound, or perhaps something like an engine failing to start on a January day in Ottawa. It may seem like an altered pronunciation of prologue (as in “what’s past in prologue; what to come, in yours and my discharge” – from Shakespeare’s Tempest, avec ou sans teakettle). It may seem to want to be followed with “row your boat, gently down the stream,” in a round. It has that strange double-vision of the roro (“This again?!”). It may seem like an out-of-order poor urge, or like watching an ogre pour confusion.

But beyond all that, it is also a contronym of sorts. It has a – now obsolete – meaning “make last longer” and a similar – still current – meaning “formally extend (e.g., an appointment in office)”. And yet, pretty much from the beginning of its use in English, it also has had a meaning “defer, postpone” and a related more specifically legislative meaning “discontinue meetings (for a period of time or until the next session)”. Both meanings can be in operation simultaneously on the same act with different recipients: in 2008, Harper prorogued parliament (the discontinuing sense) and in so doing prorogued his party’s term as the governing party (the lengthening sense).

So, really, what you mean when you use prorogue – “ask for” – depends on what you’re asking for. And this is one thing that brings Canadians together: they all agree that Harper’s asking for something. And they all want him to get what he’s really asking for. They simply don’t all happen to mean the same thing by this.

Thanks to Rosemary Tanner for asking for this one.

pashm

The eyes, met with this word, may not quite know what to do. You may begin to stare at parts of it: the comb of the m on the end, the fireplace of the h, the slinky scarf of the s or the cozier curve of the a, the p at the opening, perhaps ready to pop…

Certainly the mind will go a bit woolly. How, after all, do you say it? Are the letters in the right order? There’s an ash in the middle, but is this really more than mixed-up remnants of mashed potatoes or shampoo? Is there ham or spam? Is it from Hampshire or the Hamptons?

You figure that it must have a two-beat rhythm, pa-shm. You might stick in a schwa between the “sh” and the “m”. But when you say it, you hear it: so soft, like falling into pillows. The mouth opens but is quickly closed again and then stays closed, lips pressed into a hum, like someone who was about to say something but had a marshmallow quickly popped into the mouth… Perhaps the lips are sealed with a kiss, an act of passion.

In fact – I’ll tell you – the pash isn’t quite like the start of passion. It is an “ah” as in are or as in father, or it could be more central, like the vowel in lush. And then if you can slide onto the “m” straight from the “sh”, do so; otherwise, make it rhyme with hush ’em.

There’s no way this is an originally Germanic word. No, it’s not, you’re right. If you think it looks like pasha, yes, it does, and though it’s not cognate, they do come from the same language: Persian. Ah, exotic Persian… also known in modern times as Farsi. It is an Indo-European language, and many of the words in it are obviously related to their equivalents in many other Indo-European languages (including ours). For instance, if you were to take your pashm and have a shirt made of it, you could use the Persian word for shirt: kamiz. Give it to your mother: mader. Give her six: shesh.

You may have reasonably inferred that pashm is a fabric. In fact, I have misled you slightly: pashm actually refers to the wool of the changthangi goat, which is indigenous to the Himalayas, notably Kashmir (there’s a reason Kashmir sounds like cashmere, by the way: they’re two spellings of the same word, originally). The goats are now often raised in the Gobi desert and outer Mongolia. The word pashm is simply the Persian word for “wool”.

The fabric made from it, for its part, is called pashmina. Ah! Now, does that look familiar? You may have seen it coming. And if you know what pashmina is, you know that you don’t usually make shirts from it. (Wool shirts?) No, in fact, you’re far more likely to get a shawl made of it. And that shawl can also be called a pashmina. And if you give your mother six pashminas, she’s very lucky, and you’re probably rather well off, I must say.

Or you could get her a different kind of Pashm: Max Pashm. He’s the “King of Falafel Techno”; his band play Jewish/Greek/Balkan ethnic-techno music. You could get her a copy of his CD Never Mind the Balkans, Here’s Max Pashm. Assuming she’s a Sex Pistols fan, she’ll recognize the reference – and the album cover design – right away.

For a thousand years it’s good English, then it’s a comma splice?

I was a bit surprised by a query from a freelance editor I’m working with. She was asking about how to treat sentences of the “First do this, then do that” type. “Adverbial conjunction? Run-on?” she asked. “Truth is, I’m fine with it in informal writing, especially when the two parts are very closely connected. But because so many people consider it a run-on, I usually change it.”

So many people what?

Well, it turns out she’s right. Many people do think that it’s wrong to write, for instance, “I picked up the groceries, then I stopped at the liquor store.” “Comma splice!” they admonish. “Should be ‘…and then.'”

Well, geez. They should have told that to all those educated, fluent people who have been doing it that way for the past millennium or so, so they wouldn’t have been wrong all this time! Continue reading

gangbusters

Imagine a whole gang of Buster Keatons. The Keystone Kops could try to catch them, and great injuries and pratfalls would happen all around. Things would go bang. Masonry falling, people getting tossed around… And, of course, if it were made today rather than in the silent movie era, a lot of noise: police whistles, sirens, machine guns, screeching tires. And it would be a huge success. Like gangbusters.

Gang Busters was, in fact, a huge success. The true-crime-case radio show, which ran from 1936 to 1957, had exactly nothing to do with Buster Keaton or with the Keystone Kops, and was the perfect inverse of a silent movie: it was all sound and no vision. And such sound! The opening of each show featured a barrage of loud sound effects: police whistles, sirens, machine guns, screeching tires… By 1940, English speakers had taken this vigorous noise (and probably the great success of the radio show too) and mapped it onto vigorous being, and coming on like Gang Busters meant “doing really well.”

Which it has meant ever since, even though few people now know about the radio show; like gangbusters is by far the most common collocation for this word, and go (and going) and come on are the verbs that typically come before; go(ing) gangbusters is also common.

As to the overt sense of it, well, anyone can figure out what gangbusters means, and they won’t be wrong: “people who bust gangs.” When gangs were big news in the US – the roaring twenties, the dirty thirties – law enforcement officials needed to break them up and jail their members, and one who was successful at it (Eliot Ness is now the paragon) was a gangbuster. Not that they are a common vision of success now; the word seems to have taken on a life of its own such that a calling someone a gangbuster now would seem like a reference to the idiom.

And the word has the right sound and rhythm for a thumping success: three syllables, banging down the stairs like Buster Keaton, primary stress, secondary stress, unstressed, with the first syllable taking almost as long as the other two together, rather like the sound of something heavy hitting a floor and bouncing twice – or bouncing once and smashing across the floor on the second hit. The gang has a “bang” kind of sound, aided by the bursting b, and then the voiced stops with nasals give way to a voiceless fricative/stop pair /st/, like the the bouncing thing breaking, followed by the scattering sound of syllabic /r/. One is put in mind of James Brockman and Leonard Stevens’s song from the late 1920s, “I Faw Down an’ Go Boom.” Only in this case it’s a smashing success.

No need to stop just yet, though: gangbuster is a compound word. Gang comes from the verb gang “go,” as in Robert Burns’s “The best laid schemes o’ Mice an’ Men, Gang aft agley” – though Burns was no gangbuster where mice were concerned: “I wad be laith to rin an’ chase thee, Wi’ murd’ring pattle!” Anyway, gang (noun) refers to things that go together, and has more recently narrowed in sense to mean a nefarious group of persons. And buster is bust plus the agentive er; bust, in turn, is burst in an American vernacular alteration. Burst, like gang, is a good old Anglo-Saxon word, and it has always meant “break.” These days we think of it mainly as the kind of breaking that happens to things that go “bang” or “boom.” Which brings us back to Joseph Frank Keaton, who got his nickname Buster at a very young age from surviving a fall unscathed that an observer (Harry Houdini, in fact) reckoned could have broken bones. And it appears that he in turn was the original and source of the nickname and nonce-name Buster.

Lhasa

I have just learned that Lhasa de Sela, the singer who as a performer normally went just by her first name, died of breast cancer on January 1, 2010. “Llegarás mañana para el fin del mundo o el año nuevo.”

Her first CD, released in 1997, was called La Llorona, which is Spanish for “the crying woman.” Her untimely passing (only 37 years old) has surely left many of us weeping. “Llorando – de cara a la pared – se apaga la cuidad – llorando – y no hay más – muero quizas – ¿adonde estás?”

Lhasa was Mexican-American and lived more recently in Montreal, but her name was taken from the name of the capital city of Tibet. In Tibetan, it means “city of god” or “city of the gods” (lha “god” and sa “city” – although until about 14 centuries ago it was, it seems, called Rasa; ra means “goat”). Lhasa wherever you see it will be a reference to that city, whether it be in the name of the dog breed Lhasa apso or a personal name. And so it can’t escape bringing to mind images of the Potala Palace, the great white and red fortress-like structure that sits, like a protecting god, on a hill above the Tibetan capitol. “Comme un géant, ça c’est la ville.”

The Potala was the residence of the Dalai Lama and centre of his Gelugpa sect (not the only sect of Tibetan Buddhism, by the way). It was truly a centre of rarefied learning;  at 3.5 km above sea level, its air has only 68% of the oxygen you get at sea level. Lhasa was known as the Forbidden City for a long time, as it was closed to foreign visitors – and mighty hard to get to. “La route chante quand je m’en vais; je fais trois pas… la route se tait.”

The Dalai Lama was driven into exile in India in 1959. Tibet was annexed by China; Lhasa is still the capitol, but the Potala Palace is now a museum. The city has multiplied in size, mainly due to an influx of people from China. They, like most people around the world, say the name of the city as /la sa/. So why is the h there after the l? Because in Tibetan it’s not /l/ but a voiceless bilateral affricate. A what? It’s like the end of battle – from the t on – said crisply and whispered. Press the blade of your tongue against the palate around the edges, not in the middle, and then release it at the sides without voicing it. It’s a crisp, cutting sound. It’s not quite identical to the ll of Welsh, which is a fricative rather than an affricate; it is identical to the tlh of Klingon (yes, the Star Trek language invented by Marc Okrand, which just happens to have an “alphabet” designed for it that borrowed on the Tibetan alphabet’s shapes, which looked blade-like to the designers). “My name my name – nothing is the same – I won’t go back the way I came.”

Lhasa carries a special kind of exoticism. It is not the exoticism of lush tropical islands or jungles, of spaces teeming with humanity and animals; it lacks even the lush sound of Shangri-La. It is a high, cold, dry barrenness, windblown, a place where gods and the wind may travel hundreds of miles without meeting a soul, but also a place that is home to a colourful and elaborate Buddhism (a near-opposite to the austere Zen, which exists in greener climates): flamboyant deities and demons floating in blazes of red and yellow in myriad patterns. “He venido encendida al desierto pa’ quemar porque el alma prende fuego cuando deja de amar.”

But perhaps the best image to take with you now is the sand mandala: an elaborate design done by Tibetan monks, painstakingly, on a floor, a concentric, geometric design, depicting in elaborate detail and vivid colour a perfect Buddha land, a thing of splendour and beauty, all done with coloured grains of sand tapped carefully from small tubes and scraped gently into place, so that, after days and days of making, and a brief time for viewing, the windows and doors may be opened and the wind may take it all away. You can hear the sound as it sifts off into the breeze: lha-sa. “Soon this space will be too small and I’ll go outside to the huge hillside where the wild winds blow and the cold stars shine. I’ll put my foot on the living road and be carried from here to the heart of the world.”

(All quoted material in italics is from songs by Lhasa de Sela.)

magi

Epiphany Sunday found us drinking coffee: me, Daryl, Margot, and Jess. “I remember,” I said, “when I was growing up in Alberta, one reason we gave that the nativity couldn’t have happened there was that we could never get three wise men from the east.”

“I wonder,” Daryl offered, “whether that had any influence on Richard Gwyn when he title his book on Pierre Trudeau The Northern Magus.”

“The northern maggots?” Margot snorted. “May-gus, not mag-us!”

“Trust Margot to cry Fowles,” Jess said. I’m not certain that everyone at the table knew that The Magus was a book by John Fowles, but no further was made of it. Jess relaxed back to maximize her quality time with the mound of whipped cream on her beverage.

“That’s an interesting word, isn’t it, magus?” I said. “Much more commonly seen in the plural: magi. Or magi.” The first time, I said “may-jye”; the second, “madge-eye.” Naturally, Margot snorted at that. “Now, Mair-jo,” I said, deliberately riffing on her name, “I’m surprised that you don’t prefer ‘ma-goose’ and ‘magee,’ which are, after all, the Latin pronunciations.”

“I’ll toss this one back to you,” she said. “You’re the one who likes to point out that these words are now English words. So it’s been in the language long enough for the vowels to have shifted.”

“And now we are seeing another shift,” I replied. “Pronunciation of many Latin-derived or otherwise foreign-derived words is going towards a less anglicized style, like it or not. Data is often said ‘dat-a’ rather than ‘day-ta,’ for instance, and you’ll hear ‘rash-owe’ rather than ‘ray-show’ sometimes for ratio.” (“Yuck,” Margot interjected.) “And then there’s Kahlil Gibran and Genghis Khan, both of which were originally pronounced with ‘j’ where the G‘s are and were spelled that way due to old-style transliteration, but now we see them and think that since they’re not English the G‘s should be ‘g’.”

“Just like ‘fun guy’ for the plural of fungus,” Daryl said. “I mean, if we’re going to say the i as ‘eye,’ why wouldn’t we say the g as ‘j’?”

“Exactly!” Margot said. “Every reason to say ‘may-jye.'”

“Every reason except that the pronunciation seems to be shifting,” I said. “Oh, I’m not saying your pronunciation is wrong; it’s the dictionary version. There’s no question that it’s the formally correct way.”

“Thank you!” Margot said, rapping her cup on the table so hard it made a little geyser through the hole in the plastic lid. Jess interrupted her whipped-cream reverie to hand Margot a serviette or two.

“Could the shift be under the influence of magic?” Daryl mused.

Margot looked at him as if he had lost his mind. “What? Some wizards waving their wands make the vowels change?”

Magic is cognate with magus,” Jess pointed out. “In fact, it’s almost surprising that we don’t pronounce it ‘may-jic.’ Like an adjectival form of mage, though actually it comes by way of Greek magiké tekhné.”

“Maggie Kay!” Daryl said, echoing the Greek. “Sounds like a nickname for our Margot!”

“Oh, stop,” said Margot. “Maggie makes me think of Maggi, the German answer to soy sauce. Then again, so does the coffee here sometimes.” She looked at Jess’s cup. “Not that one, though.”

Daryl looked at Jess’s beverage, which appeared to have chocolate and nut sprinkles on the nearly-gone whipped cream. “What is that, anyway?”

“It’s an Oh Henry! latte,” she said. “A veritable gift of the magi.” Again, I cannot feel certain that all present recalled that ‘The Gift of the Magi’ is a short story by O. Henry.

“That would explain your adoration of it,” Margot remarked dryly. She turned to me. “I don’t cotton to your idea that somehow a pronunciation can be formally incorrect but still acceptable. It’s right or it’s wrong!”

Jess smiled. “We may have a veritable magus among us,” she said. “After all, a magus, originally, was a member of the Zoroastrian priestly class. The word comes barely altered from Old Persian – of course the plural is Latinized. But as you may know, Zoroastrianism is a dualistic religion: the world is in conflict between the pure good, the one God, the ultimate creator, Ahura Mazda, and the forces of evil, led by Ahriman.”

“Which means,” I commented, “that when Margot makes one of her all-or-nothing pronouncements, we may say, ‘Thus spoke Zarathustra.'”

“And hope,” Jess replied, “she doesn’t remember that the reference there is not to the real prophet Zoroaster, also called Zarathustra, but to Nietzsche’s version of him, who goes around proclaiming that God is dead.”

“Nietzsche is dead,” I responded. “But you’re right, we don’t want to wander into the ideas of the Übermensch and all that proto-Nazi junk.”

“Say,” Daryl said, “apropos of nothing, it occurs to me that Alberta finally got its own. Just going back to what you said about wise men coming from the east, now they’ve sent Stephen Harper to the east as their western magus.”

“Except,” I said, “Stephen Harper grew up in Toronto. So however you look at it, it’s ironic.”

“Well,” said Margot, “isn’t that an epiphany!”

palindrome

It has been pointed out to me that today (as I write this, but that won’t last long) is a palindrome in the US style – 01/02/2010 – and the ISO style (which I prefer because it sorts chronologically) – 2010.01.02. Or leave out the periods. 20100102: nary a dot; still, it’s today, ran 20100102.

Palindromes are great fun for word geek types, and if you’re reading this, you’re probably one such. You will likely greatly enjoy Weird Al Yankovic’s song “Bob,” every line of which is a palindrome, and it even rhymes.

Alas, palindrome is not itself a palindrome, which has given rise to the occasional appendage of emordnilap or semordnilap for no other reason than mirror effect. When we taste palindrome, we find that it has resonances that may or may not have anything to do with reversibility. Drome brings up various echoes: dromedary (a one-humped camel), syndrome, velodrome (on which the bicycles always go the same way), Videodrome (a psychological thriller directed by David Cronenberg)… Wherever you see drome (or the drom in dromedary), it’s from Greek dromos, “running.”

And palin? Palin may bring to mind a member of Monty Python, or it may make one think of a politician who makes as much sense backwards as forwards. It’s Greek for “back” (or “again”) – palinode refers to a poem or song retracting an earlier view; palingenesis means “rebirth” (it has more specialized usages); a palimpsest (with the n turned to m due to place assimilation with the p) is a rescraped parchment – something had been written on it, and that was scraped off and something new written on top. Sometimes, with ancient palimpsests (not that modern ones are common), what was scraped off is of more interest to us now, so we try to figure out what it was.

Palindromes can be words, or numbers, or even musical pieces. I actually quite like sound palindromes – things that have the same mouth movements backwards or forwards, even if they’re not spelled the same both ways. An example would be Can I annoy, yon? A knack! (OK, not all that coherent an example.) Try rolling this on your mouth slowly and you will see what I mean – for example, I said backwards is yah or the beginning of yon. Palindrome, for its part, said backwards comes out like morjnilap… Still nothing. Hey – nor, in a loop, drown in word pool. An irony, eh?

quantum

And so a new year has arrived and another chronological quantum has elapsed.

Can I use quantum that way? Yes, I can, drawing on its older but not obsolete sense simply of “discrete amount.” The word comes from the Latin meaning “how much” and has also been used to mean “something that has quantity,” “total amount or quantity,” and “individual share”; it has been circulating in these senses since the 16th century.

But we have Max Planck and Albert Einstein to thank for its most common current sense, which is “the smallest amount that can exist.” That is, if you take something, be it matter or time or electrical charge or whatnot, and cut it in half and in half and in half and so on, you will come to a point where it is impossible to cut any further. This amount that can’t be divided is a quantum.

Among the other things that have quanta are energy levels. The energy level of an electron can vary, but since it’s a very small thing and these energy levels are as a result very small, it can’t vary by less than a certain amount. Say there are levels 1 and 2: it can be at level 1 or level 2, but not at any level in between. So it jumps from one level to another – a quantum jump or, as it is now commonly called, a quantum leap.

A quantum leap, thus, in physics, is a very small change – the smallest possible change. In popular usage, on the other hand, quantum leap, with its space-age-sounding quantum and its leap that almost feels like the act of leaping, has come to mean a very big change. Naturally, there are plenty of people who will line up to tell you that this usage is wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong! Quantum leaps are as small as small can be! Sheesh!

But there is actually nothing keeping quantum leap from describing something quite macroscopic. The essential characteristic of a quantum leap is that it is a change from one discrete state to another, with no intermediate possible – like flicking off a light switch that has no dimmer on it. The smallness of it in relation to subatomic particles is a simple entailment of this characteristic; if it can’t be subdivided, it must be very small. There are, however, things in life that are much larger state changes with no intermediates. You’re married or you’re not, for instance. Thus, something that is a huge change but that is unavoidably an abrupt change from one state to another could be said to be a quantum leap.

Admittedly, people who use quantum leap for very big things likely are not following this thought process; they’re probably thinking something more along the lines of “scientific! technical! space age! stars! space ships! warp engines! lllleeeeaaaap!”And they might use it for changes that in fact could have lesser degrees. Which would not be true to the source.

Quantum also shows up with words other than leap, to be sure. Some of its other close friends are mechanics, theory, physics, and computing. All of this gives it that far-out, space-agey feel that is exploited in its use in brand names. This is all the more so because while people generally know little about quantum mechanics, they do tend to know it’s pretty weird and that things happen in it that don’t really work the way we would think they should. There’s lots of uncertainty and improbability, and then there’s that thing about someone’s cat in a box (Schrödinger’s, to be precise) being simultaneously dead and alive until someone checks… On top of this, the q makes it feel questioning and quirky, and the um makes it feel formal or technical.

But, while it will always now be flavoured by its scientific connotations, it is still used in the older senses, sometimes even in popular entertainments. We can all take a quantum of solace in that.

syne

Jess looked around at the party. She glanced at a pile of oversized gift-wrapped boxes sitting nearby as decorations, scanned the assembled masses of word freaks rubbing elbows in hubbub, took measure of the supply of syllabub, squinted at the walls. Whatever clocks there might have been were obscured in tenebrity. “How are we supposed to know when it’s midnight?”

She turned her focus to my left wrist. “Are you wearing one of your cool watches?”

I pulled one of my French cuffs from the sleeve of my tuxedo jacket to display a chronometric cufflink. “I have this. But I doubt it will be accepted as the official time. Especially since –” I extended the other cuff with its matching cufflink – “I also have this, and they’re not in perfect agreement.”

“Well, I don’t see a TV. We’re going to need some kind of sign.”

Maury stepped up, having escaped the serial beleaguerment of Wen Raey. “You’ll get a sign,” He said. “An auld lang sign.”

“Oh, that Burns,” Jess said, smirking. “Should auld acquaintance be forgot?”

Old, I don’t know,” Maury said, glancing back at Wen, “but some new ones, perhaps.”

“Yes,” I said, “it’s not so lang syne I met Wen.”

“When what?” Jess said, almost certainly disingenuously.

“And,” said Maury, “when she left you, syne she met me.”

“Wait,” Jess said, “that’s another syne.”

“Well,” Maury replied, “syne first meant ‘then’ or ‘next’ – actually it’s a contraction of sithen, which means ‘next,’ ‘thereafter,’ and so on.”

“And then it added the meaning ‘since,'” I said, “and after that it came also to have the meaning ‘before,’ as in lang syne – ‘long before.'”

“Ha!” exclaimed Jess. “That’s not a syne! That’s a co-syne!”

“Cosine?” I said. “Don’t go on a tangent. I’m not cosigning your mortgage.”

“It’s not a cosine,” Maury said. “It’s just a secant meaning. Anyway, auld lang syne has meant ‘days of yore’ or ‘once upon a time’ since long before Robert Burns.”

“Perhaps,” Jess proposed, “since so many people sing the song with a [z] instead of an [s] on the syne, we should just assign that meaning to that pronunciation and let the [s] be the original.”

“What the heck,” I said, “most people don’t really know what it means, or give it much thought. It might as well be a magical incantation. Burns’s verses are rarely quoted right anyway.”

“It’s just a pretty-looking word,” Maury added, “with that y there, like the top half of an hourglass plus the tail of sand trickling down.”

Jess was looking around again. “None of which helps us to know…”

But of course we should have counted on Elisa Lively to let us know. With no warning, she erupted from the largest decorated box, a metre or so away, and screamed “Happy New Year! Wooooooo!” Then she opened a bottle of fizzy in race-car-driver fashion.

And then the assembled masses proceeded to give the lie to my assertion about correct quotation, as they all sang:

Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
and never brought to mind?
Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
and auld lang syne?

For auld lang syne, my jo,
for auld lang syne,
we’ll tak a cup o’ kindness yet,
for auld lang syne.

Maury, Jess, and I started waving our arms up and down in sequence as we sang.

“What are you doing?!” Elisa whooped in our direction.

And, in unison as though by design, we replied, “The syne wave!”